Skip to the content
The Library
of Alexandria
Sign inSign inTry 3 months freeStart free

The Critique of Pure Reason, Section I summary

Section I of 79 · Part 2: Transcendental Logic · 2 min to read the section

In Section I, the argument defines human understanding as cognition through concepts rather than intuition, and explains judgment as an indirect way of knowing objects by unifying representations. This makes judging the central activity of understanding and identifies the unifying functions of judgments as the route to discovering its functions.

What happens

  1. Human understanding knows through concepts because intuition depends on sensibility.
  2. Concepts depend on functions, which bring diverse representations under a common representation.
  3. Concepts serve in judgments and reach objects indirectly through other representations.
  4. The examples of divisibility, bodies, and metal show how concepts function as predicates.
  5. The argument reduces understanding to judging and proposes identifying its functions through the functions that unify judgments.

Free for 3 months

Read the whole of The Critique of Pure Reason, free

  • 200,000+ classics as eBooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
  • Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan
Start freeRenews every year · Cancel anytime

Quick check

How does a concept relate to an object?

Cite this page

“The Critique of Pure Reason, Section I summary.” Library of Alexandria, 2026, libraryofalexandria.com/pages/the-critique-of-pure-reason-section-1-summary.

Free for 3 months

Read the whole of The Critique of Pure Reason, free

  • 200,000+ classics as eBooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
  • Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan
Start freeRenews every year · Cancel anytime
Read Section I in the book

The whole book to read and hear, and the printed book, large print included, at cost.

Read free