The Federalist Papers, Federalist No. 76 summary
Federalist No. 76 of 85 · 7 min to read the paper
In Federalist No. 76, Hamilton argues that presidential nomination combines the responsibility of individual judgment with the Senate’s power to check unsuitable appointments. He defends this arrangement against proposals for sole presidential appointment and fears of executive corruption, arguing that Senate independence and constitutional restrictions provide meaningful safeguards.
What happens
- Hamilton outlines the appointment rules and connects capable officeholders with good administration.
- He argues that individual responsibility encourages careful selection, while collective appointment invites partisan bargaining and personal favors.
- The President retains control of nominations even when the Senate rejects a candidate.
- Senate approval discourages favoritism by exposing presidential choices to independent scrutiny.
- Hamilton rejects the assumption of universal corruption and cites constitutional restrictions that limit executive influence over legislators.
Free for 3 months
Get the full summary of The Federalist Papers, free
- 200,000+ classics as eBooks, audiobooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
- Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan
Start freeNothing to pay today. USD 0.14 a day in the first year, then USD 0.27 a day.
In this paper
Quick check
What happens if the Senate rejects a presidential nominee?
Free for 3 months
Get the full summary of The Federalist Papers, free
- 200,000+ classics as eBooks, audiobooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
- Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan
Start freeNothing to pay today. USD 0.14 a day in the first year, then USD 0.27 a day.
200,000+ classics to read, hear and hold
15-minute summaries today, eBooks and audiobooks as each book opens, and printed books, large print included, at cost.
Try 3 months free
