The Federalist Papers, Federalist No. 66 summary

What happens

1. Publius argues that limited mixing of government powers provides checks, while separate accusers and judges and a two-thirds conviction requirement protect defendants.
2. He contrasts critics’ objections with New York’s constitution, which gives its Senate extensive judicial authority.
3. He rejects fears of excessive Senate power by stressing the House’s control over money bills, impeachment accusations, and certain presidential elections.
4. He argues that approving presidential nominees does not give senators a strong personal attachment to those officials.
5. He distinguishes collective treaty decisions from individual corruption and argues that the Senate has reasons to punish abuses.

In this paper

Quick check