Human, All Too Human, Part 68 summary
Part 68 of 152 · 1 min to read the part
In 68, the argument shows how results shape moral judgments, leading both observers and actors to mistake success for good intentions and failure for guilt. It then challenges the use of historical victory as proof of truth, contrasting Christianity’s triumph with the sciences’ connection to Epicurus.
What happens
- Observers and actors judge an action’s morality by its outcome because intentions remain unclear and results distort memory.
- Success makes intentions seem honorable, while failure burdens even worthy actions with guilt.
- A politician’s maxim presents success as a means of winning moral approval from others and oneself.
- The argument rejects Christianity’s victory over Greek philosophy as evidence of greater truth.
- The sciences’ connection to Epicurus contrasts with Christianity’s opposition to his philosophy.
Free for 3 months
Get the full summary of Human, All Too Human: A Book for Free Spirits, free
- 200,000+ classics as eBooks, audiobooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
- Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan
Start freeNothing to pay today. USD 0.14 a day in the first year, then USD 0.27 a day.
Quick check
Which philosophy does the argument connect with the reviving sciences?
Free for 3 months
Get the full summary of Human, All Too Human: A Book for Free Spirits, free
- 200,000+ classics as eBooks, audiobooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
- Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan
Start freeNothing to pay today. USD 0.14 a day in the first year, then USD 0.27 a day.
200,000+ classics to read, hear and hold
15-minute summaries today, eBooks and audiobooks as each book opens, and printed books, large print included, at cost.
Try 3 months free
