Summary
Summary of Apostolic Tradition
Who it’s for
This is for readers of church history, liturgy and early Christian life, and for anyone curious how worship looked before the age of great basilicas. It may suit you less if you want a story or a doctrinal argument.
What this book is
Apostolic Tradition is an early Christian church order, a practical handbook that tells a community how to choose its leaders, welcome new members, share the Eucharist and pray through the day. It was long linked to Hippolytus, a teacher at Rome in the early third century, and many scholars still date its core to around 215. The original Greek is lost. The text survives in Latin, Coptic, Arabic and Ethiopic versions, and in later church books that borrowed from it.
Why read it? Because it shows worship in the making. There is no sermon on doctrine here. There are prayers to say, steps to follow and rules to keep, written by someone who wants the customs of his church handed on unchanged. You will hear how a bishop is ordained, what a candidate for baptism must give up, and how the great prayer of thanksgiving is shaped. The first key point is the hardest one: who wrote this book, and how do we know the text at all?
In this summary
- 1A handbook whose author is disputedFree
- 2Bishops are chosen by the whole people
- 3Not every ministry needs ordination
- 4The great prayer of thanksgiving
- 5Three years of preparing for baptism
- 6Baptism at dawn and a day of prayer
Key point 1 of 6
A handbook whose author is disputed
The book calls itself a tradition handed down from the apostles. It opens with a short prologue in which the writer says he sets down what the church must keep, so that no one falls into error through ignorance. For many decades scholars read it as the work of Hippolytus of Rome, a learned presbyter and writer who lived around the start of the third century. On that view the book gives a picture of Roman worship at about the year 215.
That view is now debated. The Greek original has not survived, so scholars rebuild the text from translations. The chief witness is a Latin version found on a palimpsest in Verona, copied in the fifth century. Coptic, Arabic and Ethiopic versions add more, and each differs from the others in places. Because the versions disagree, any modern edition is a reconstruction. The best known was made by Bernard Botte in 1963.
Some recent scholars, among them Paul Bradshaw, argue that the book is not one man's work at one moment. They see a collection of material from several places and periods, edited over time, with little proof that it is Roman or that Hippolytus wrote it. Others still defend the older view. Both sides agree on one point: the text matters a great deal.
This is why the book stands outside the Bible. It was never a gospel or a letter, and no church counted it as scripture. It is a church order, like the Didache and the later Didascalia. Its weight comes from use. Later church orders copied it, and so it passed into Eastern and Western practice.
So when you read it, hold the date loosely. It may show one church around 215, or it may show a long habit of worship gathered by many hands.
That’s 1 of 6 key points.
The rest of the summary, written and spoken, and the whole book: free to start.
- Nothing to pay today · Renews every year
- We email you before you pay
- Cancel online in two clicks