Socialism, Utopian and Scientificの読書会で話し合う質問

読書計画

第1回の読書会：Part I

1. Can a plan for a better society be convincing before economic conditions support it?
2. What makes reason a strength or a weakness when challenging capitalist society?
3. How fair is it to judge Saint-Simon, Fourier, and Robert Owen by economic conditions their systems did not depend on?
4. What might lead someone to build a social system around reason rather than existing economic conditions?
5. What does the gap between reason and economic conditions suggest about the limits of social planning?

第2回の読書会：Part II

6. Does studying conflict offer a stronger basis for understanding society than reasoning about how society should be?
7. How convincing is changing nature as a starting point for explaining human society?
8. What might an account centered on economic conflict help us see, and what might it overlook?
9. What should count as evidence when calling an account of socialism scientific?
10. Does the move toward economic conflict answer the limits of utopian socialism, or mainly change the questions being asked?

第3回の読書会：Part III

11. Does explaining capitalist crises through economic change make workers' collective control a convincing response?
12. What would make workers' collective control fair, and what questions of fairness would still need answers?
13. How much does explaining a crisis tell us about who should control production?
14. What practical questions would you ask before supporting workers taking collective control?
15. How does the argument for collective control change your view of the earlier reliance on reason?

話し合うテーマ

進行役へのヒント

1. 毎回、誰でも答えられる質問から始めて、その後で話を深めてください。
2. 読むのが遅れている方は、次の内容で追いつけます： 15分で読める要約.