Meno 독서 모임 토론 질문

읽기 계획

모임 1: Part 1

1. When Socrates challenges Meno's answers, what would make those challenges helpful rather than discouraging?
2. How much agreement about the meaning of virtue should people need before discussing it?
3. What might make recognizing ignorance feel like progress rather than failure?
4. How might Meno respond constructively to having his answers challenged?
5. What makes recollection a convincing or unconvincing defense of inquiry?
6. What might questions about squares offer a discussion about defining virtue?
7. How would you judge whether Socrates' questions help the boy think for himself?
8. What reasons might Socrates have for challenging answers rather than simply offering a definition?

모임 2: Part 2

9. When might a true belief be enough, and when would you want knowledge instead?
10. What would make questioning a slave strong evidence for recollection?
11. What should count as evidence that someone can teach virtue?
12. How might the distinction between knowledge and opinion change the search for moral teachers?
13. What does questioning offer as a way to explore recollection, and what might it leave uncertain?
14. How should a group decide whether an opinion deserves trust?
15. What connections do you see between defining virtue and finding someone who can teach it?

토론 주제

진행자를 위한 도움말

1. 모임마다 누구나 답할 수 있는 질문 하나로 시작한 뒤, 더 깊이 이야기해 보세요.
2. 읽기가 늦어진 분은 다음 자료로 진도를 따라잡을 수 있어요: 15분 요약.