The Federalist Papers, Federalist No. 26 summary
Federalist No. 26 of 85 · 9 min to read the paper
In Federalist No. 26, Hamilton argues that restricting legislative control over national defense weakens public safety, while requiring renewed army funding every two years protects liberty without blocking necessary action. He traces distrust of standing armies to England and explains how elections, public scrutiny, opposition members, and State legislatures check military abuse.
What happens
- Hamilton argues that distrust of government can produce restrictions that endanger the public rather than protect liberty.
- He traces American suspicion of peacetime armies to English struggles against royal power and the settlement of 1688.
- He distinguishes limits on a monarch from restrictions on elected legislatures and questions the force of merely cautionary provisions.
- He defends the Constitution’s two-year limit on military appropriations as a practical safeguard requiring repeated public decisions.
- He argues that opposition members, State legislatures, elections, and visible military expansion make a sustained conspiracy difficult.
- He acknowledges dangers from armies required by emergencies but argues that union reduces the need for dangerously large forces.

Free for 3 months
Get the full summary of Le Fédéraliste, free
- 200,000+ classics as eBooks, audiobooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
- Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan
In this paper
Quick check
How long may military appropriations last under the proposed Constitution?

Free for 3 months
Get the full summary of Le Fédéraliste, free
- 200,000+ classics as eBooks, audiobooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
- Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan

15-minute summaries today, eBooks and audiobooks as each book opens, and printed books, large print included, at cost.
Try 3 months free

















