Thirty pieces of silver
Thirty pieces of silver means a reward accepted for betraying someone or abandoning a principle; it comes from the story of Judas in The Gospel according to Matthew. The phrase condemns the bargain, suggesting that personal gain has been put above loyalty or conscience.
Where it comes from
Judas agrees to betray Jesus
The phrase appears in The Gospel according to Matthew. The chief priests give Judas silver in return for his help in handing Jesus over to them.
In The Gospel according to Matthew, Judas approaches the chief priests and agrees to help them seize Jesus. Later, he leads an armed crowd to Jesus and identifies him with a kiss.
In The Gospel according to Matthew by Traditionally attributed to Matthew
A reward that carries shame
Today the phrase describes a benefit gained through betrayal. The benefit need not be money: it might be a promotion, protection, or influence.
In The Gospel according to Matthew, Judas feels remorse after Jesus is condemned and returns the silver to the chief priests. When they refuse responsibility, he throws the money into the temple and leaves.
In The Gospel according to Matthew by Traditionally attributed to Matthew
How to use Thirty pieces of silver
- Identify the loyalty or principle being betrayed.
- Make clear what benefit the betrayer receives.
- Reserve the phrase for a serious accusation.
Does it have to mean actual money?
No, the phrase can refer to any benefit accepted in exchange for betrayal. Someone might use it about a job, a favour, or political support. What matters is the exchange of loyalty or principle for personal advantage.
Is it a strong accusation?
Yes, it is a strong accusation because it compares someone’s conduct with Judas’s betrayal of Jesus. It suggests deliberate disloyalty for personal gain, not simply a mistake or disagreement. In ordinary conversation, it can sound bitter or harsh.
Related terms
200,000+ classics to read and hear, and printed books, large print included, at cost.
Try 3 months free
