The Federalist Papers, Federalist No. 77 summary
Federalist No. 77 of 85 · 8 min to read the paper
In Federalist No. 77, Publius argues that presidential nomination with Senate approval promotes stable administration and makes responsibility for appointments clear, unlike secretive councils or participation by the House. He also defends the remaining executive powers and concludes that elections, legal accountability, and legislative checks combine energetic government with republican safety.
What happens
- Publius argues that Senate consent for appointments and removals protects capable officials against replacement when the presidency changes hands.
- He rejects claims that shared appointment powers give either the President or the Senate improper influence over the other.
- He contrasts clear responsibility under the proposed system with secrecy and uncertain accountability in New York’s appointment council.
- He argues that appointment councils encourage favoritism and that House participation brings instability, delays, and difficulties.
- He lists the remaining executive powers and explains why the President may need to convene the Senate alone.
- He concludes that elections, impeachment, ordinary prosecution, and legislative checks provide safeguards against executive abuse.

Free for 3 months
Get the full summary of Le Fédéraliste, free
- 200,000+ classics as eBooks, audiobooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
- Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan
In this paper
Quick check
Why does Publius defend the power to convene the Senate alone?

Free for 3 months
Get the full summary of Le Fédéraliste, free
- 200,000+ classics as eBooks, audiobooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
- Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan

15-minute summaries today, eBooks and audiobooks as each book opens, and printed books, large print included, at cost.
Try 3 months free

















