The Critique of Pure Reason, Part 31 summary
Part 31 of 79 · Part 2: Transcendental Logic · 4 min to read the part
In In Cognition, the Category’s Only Legitimate Use Is Its Application to Objects o, the argument distinguishes thinking from knowing and limits the categories’ use in cognition to objects of experience. Even mathematics requires possible application to empirical intuition, while descriptions that merely deny sensory features cannot establish knowledge of nonsensuous objects.
What happens
- The argument distinguishes thinking an object through a concept from knowing it through both a concept and an intuition.
- Because human intuition is sensory, pure concepts yield cognition only through application to objects of sense.
- Mathematical cognition concerns phenomenal form and requires possible application to empirical intuition.
- Categories can express thoughts beyond our sensory range, but these thoughts lack objective reality without corresponding intuition.
- Denying sensory properties to a supposed nonsensuous object establishes neither knowledge of it nor the applicability of any category.

Free for 3 months
Get the full summary of Critique de la raison pure, free
- 200,000+ classics as eBooks, audiobooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
- Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan
In this part
Quick check
Why does a merely negative description of a nonsensuous object fail to establish knowledge?

Free for 3 months
Get the full summary of Critique de la raison pure, free
- 200,000+ classics as eBooks, audiobooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
- Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan

15-minute summaries today, eBooks and audiobooks as each book opens, and printed books, large print included, at cost.
Try 3 months free

















