The Critique of Pure Reason, Book 2 summary
Book 2 of 79 · Part 2: Transcendental Logic · 2 min to read the book
In Book 2, the speaker distinguishes general logic, which studies thought’s form, from transcendental logic, which concerns pure a priori cognition and excludes reason’s illusory claims from its analytic. This distinction defines the analytic of principles as a guide for judgment in applying pure concepts of understanding to phenomena.
What happens
- General logic organizes its analytic around understanding, judgment, and reason, corresponding to concepts, judgments, and inferences.
- Because general logic disregards cognition’s content, it can establish rules for reason through analysis of reason’s operations.
- Transcendental logic assigns reason’s objectively invalid transcendental use to dialectic rather than analytic.
- Understanding and judgment retain rules for objectively valid use, while reason’s claims beyond possible experience remain illusory.
- The speaker defines the analytic of principles as instruction for judgment in applying pure concepts to phenomena.
Free for 3 months
Get the full summary of Critique de la raison pure, free
- 200,000+ classics as eBooks, audiobooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
- Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan
Commencez 90 jours gratuitsNothing to pay today. 0,14 USD a day in the first year, then 0,27 USD a day.
Quick check
What task does the analytic of principles give judgment?
Free for 3 months
Get the full summary of Critique de la raison pure, free
- 200,000+ classics as eBooks, audiobooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
- Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan
Commencez 90 jours gratuitsNothing to pay today. 0,14 USD a day in the first year, then 0,27 USD a day.
200,000+ classics to read, hear and hold
15-minute summaries today, eBooks and audiobooks as each book opens, and printed books, large print included, at cost.
Try 3 months free
