The Brothers Karamazov, Chapter 12 summary
Chapter 12 of 96 · Part 4 · 14 min to read the chapter
In Chapter 12, Fetyukovitch argues that the evidence does not prove his client murders his father, and he presents Smerdyakov as a possible killer. He warns the jury against convicting on uncertain facts, then changes course by asking them to consider his client’s position even if they assume his guilt.
What happens
- Fetyukovitch argues that the drunken letter, threats, and readily available pestle do not establish a planned murder.
- He suggests that the prisoner leaves his father alive and returns to help Grigory out of genuine compassion.
- He challenges the exclusion of Smerdyakov, citing his suicide, Ivan Karamazov’s testimony, and unresolved suspicions.
- He proposes that Smerdyakov recovers from his seizure, kills for money, and leaves the prisoner to bear the blame.
- He questions the envelope evidence and Grigory’s wife’s account, then warns the jury against relying on accumulated uncertainties.
- He introduces a hypothetical admission of guilt; applause interrupts him, and the President threatens to clear the courtroom.
Free for 3 months
Get the full summary of The Brothers Karamazov, free
- 200,000+ classics as eBooks, audiobooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
- Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan
In this chapter
What to notice
The distinction challenges the claim that Smerdyakov’s suicide should include a confession. Fetyukovitch argues that self-destruction need not imply remorse.
Quick check
How does Fetyukovitch explain Smerdyakov’s possible failure to confess before suicide?
Free for 3 months
Get the full summary of The Brothers Karamazov, free
- 200,000+ classics as eBooks, audiobooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
- Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan
15-minute summaries today, eBooks and audiobooks as each book opens, and printed books, large print included, at cost.
Try 3 months free
