Résumé
Résumé de Trimorphic Protennoia
À qui s’adresse-t-il ?
For readers who love early Christianity, Gnosticism and the Nag Hammadi books, and anyone curious about the Gospel of John's background.
De quoi parle ce livre ?
Trimorphic Protennoia is an anonymous religious text from the ancient Mediterranean world. The title is Greek and means the three-formed first thought. It survives in Coptic, the language of late ancient Egypt, in a single damaged copy. Scholars link it to the Sethian Gnostic tradition, a movement that told its own story of creation, a fall into matter, and a rescue by a divine being from above. Its date is debated, and most place the writing between the second and fourth centuries.
The whole text is spoken in the first person by a divine power. She is the first thought of the highest God, and she comes down to the world three times, each time in a different form. She speaks as Voice, as Speech and as Word. In this summary you will hear how the text is arranged, what each of the three discourses says, how it echoes the opening of the Gospel of John, and how a modern reader can approach such an unusual book. First, a word on where it was found.
Dans ce résumé
- 1A Coptic book from the Egyptian desertFree
- 2One speaker appears in three forms
- 3The Voice speaks from before the beginning
- 4The Speech enters the world of the rulers
- 5The Word comes down in human likeness
- 6Why it stands outside the Bible and how to read it
Point clé 1 sur 6
A Coptic book from the Egyptian desert
In 1945 a group of ancient books was found near Nag Hammadi in Upper Egypt. They were papyrus codices, which are early books with pages, and they held more than fifty texts in Coptic. Many were Gnostic works that had been lost for centuries or known only through the complaints of their opponents. Trimorphic Protennoia stands in the last of these books, known as Codex XIII.
That codex is in poor shape. Only some of its leaves have survived, and the opening of the text is damaged, so a few lines are missing or uncertain. Scholars piece the sense together from what remains and from parallels in other Sethian writings. The ancient scribe's title for the work comes at the end, and the modern name draws on it.
The Coptic copy is almost certainly a translation. Most scholars think the original was written in Greek, probably in Egypt or elsewhere in the eastern Mediterranean. Nobody knows who wrote it. The text names no author and claims no famous apostle behind it.
The date is argued over. Some scholars see an older core from the second century, later reworked with Christian language. Others think the whole text is Christian from the start and falls in the third century. Both views agree that it was written long before the Coptic copy was made, which belongs to the fourth century.
That’s 1 of 6 key points.
The rest of the summary, written and spoken, and the whole book: free to start.
- Nothing to pay today · Renews every year
- We email you before you pay
- Cancel online in two clicks
Questions about Trimorphic Protennoia
What is Trimorphic Protennoia about?
It is a speech by a divine power, the first thought of the hidden God. She descends three times, as Voice, Speech and Word, to wake people trapped under the rulers of this world and lead them back to the light.
What does Trimorphic Protennoia mean?
Protennoia is Greek for first thought, and trimorphic means three-formed. The title refers to the one divine power who appears in three forms: Voice, Speech and Word, linked with Father, Mother and Son.
Where was Trimorphic Protennoia found?
It was found near Nag Hammadi in Upper Egypt in 1945, in Codex XIII of a collection of Coptic books. Only a damaged part of that codex survives, so some lines are missing.
Is Trimorphic Protennoia related to the Gospel of John?
The third discourse echoes John's opening about the Word coming into the world. Scholars disagree on whether this text borrowed from John or both drew on older traditions, so the question remains open.
Is Trimorphic Protennoia in the Bible?
No. It is a Sethian Gnostic text, and mainstream Christian leaders rejected such teaching about a lesser creator and saving knowledge. It was not gathered into the canon and was lost until the Nag Hammadi find.