Human, All Too Human, Part 133 summary
Part 133 of 152 · 3 min to read the part
In 133, the argument attributes human self-condemnation to mistaken judgments, rejects completely selfless action, and questions comparison with a loving God. It argues that understanding belief as a human creation weakens religious guilt, while accepting that every action is necessary would remove the remaining pangs of conscience.
What happens
- The argument presents hateful self-judgment as the result of a faulty standard created by human imagination.
- It denies that anyone can act without personal motives, citing Lichtenberg and La Rochefoucauld on love.
- Complete self-sacrifice requires both personal upkeep and selfish recipients, making its moral ideal depend on its opposite.
- The Christian's comparison with God resembles Don Quixote's discouraging comparison with imaginary heroes.
- Rejecting divine authority weakens guilt, though fear of human punishment and contempt remains.
- The argument concludes that fully accepting necessary action and the absence of responsibility would end remorse.

Free for 3 months
Get the full summary of Humain, trop humain : un livre pour esprits libres, free
- 200,000+ classics as eBooks, audiobooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
- Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan
In this part
What to notice
The question condenses the rejection of purely selfless action. It challenges the standard by which people condemn their own motives.
Quick check
Why does the argument compare the Christian with Don Quixote?

Free for 3 months
Get the full summary of Humain, trop humain : un livre pour esprits libres, free
- 200,000+ classics as eBooks, audiobooks and 15-minute summaries, and print and large print at cost
- Up to 5 readers in your home on one plan

15-minute summaries today, eBooks and audiobooks as each book opens, and printed books, large print included, at cost.
Try 3 months free

















