War and Peace: resumen de Part 2: Second Epilogue, Chapter 4

Qué sucede

1. The narrator rejects divine appointment, physical strength, and moral superiority as adequate explanations of a ruler's power.
2. Jurisprudence defines power through the people's consent, but this definition struggles to explain changes of rulers, revolutions, and conquests.
3. Unconditional delegation makes historians defend incompatible authorities, while delegation under known conditions conflicts with historical examples.
4. Delegation under unknown conditions leaves historians unable to establish which actions of leaders express a nation's life.
5. The narrator challenges abstract historical goals and argues that biographies cannot explain mass movements, religious violence, or revolution.

En qué fijarte

The question exposes the central difficulty in treating leaders as representatives of collective action. It shifts attention from individual biographies to the unexplained movements of populations.

Comprobación rápida